Regardless of the stock, when the market as a whole takes a dive, virtually all stock will go down, so if you're buying, you must implicitly have a positive view of the market.
I think we would all want to be the ones who pick the strategy that loses the least in a market dive. In an up market, we want to be more up, don't we?
The point is if you are buying or selling stock - any stock, you must have a view of the market as a whole going forward. Regardless of the stock, when the market as a whole takes a dive, virtually all stock will go down, so if you're buying, you must implicitly have a positive view of the market. If you're buying and do not have a positive view of the market, you're making a big mistake.
I would tend to think that most stocks go up and down pretty much with the market. When people panic, they sell everything.
If I wanted to play the "market" I would be in an index fund. DS has done very well in SP500 index and he has another 30-40 years of investing. Me, I can't play the market bc we are in retirement mode. I can no longer take a 40% decline as the markets did in 2008-2009 and then wait for the markets to recover. Most of our retirement money is now in annuities that have a guarantee factor. The relatively small amount of money I held out of annuities is to "hedge" the market in individual opportunities.
I assume you have read some basic investment guide books. I assume you have manageable debt and certain insurances where needed?
My interests went elsewhere after AAPL. Today, do I have a conviction on AAPL-No, I don't. They are no longer unique although they do have market share and probably will be very big in Asia-China. The share price is too much for me.
Do stocks go up and down with the market? You do have Yahoo or something similar where you can compare charts of companies and indexes?
I would tend to think that most stocks go up and down pretty much with the market. When people panic, they sell everything.
So what's your point? Unless you are a short player, don't you want to own the stock(s) of choice when the market goes up and out of the stock when the market goes down? So tell me which company/index will go up or down. I should have panic'd in early 2008 but I held and relied on the professional MF people. Who would have guessed that some of the largest and best rated companies in the World became insolvent or close to insolvency in a matter of months or days. It was a near thing that a handful of Republican Congressmen voted for TARP and Stimulus Act of 2009.
The best, the brightest, and the most highly paid people did do wrong in the building of the credit bubble and its collapse.
You no longer have a strong conviction on aapl? I would tend to think that most stocks go up and down pretty much with the market. When people panic, they sell everything.
i had strong conviction with aapl, at that time and tolerated the negative until i lost the conviction. i have no idea about the future. i choose my picks that i hope will increase in value not what the market will do.
OK - so perhaps your stop loss of 50 was not a good stop loss as you didn't follow it. What are you doing now with your money and where do you think the market is heading - what is your conviction?
I will admit that there is a rough correlation in the long term but not so on the short term. Isn't the goal is to beat the market either when the market is up or down both on the short term and long term? I am up 25-30% YTD on my two primary trading accounts vs SP500 is up 17% (I don't track it, something I heard on CNBC). Do you think I should let my stock picks ride, take some off, short, or double down?
When a stock takes a jump, 20-30% in a matter of a couple days or weeks and certainly in a few months, How long do you want to hold that stock? Do you take your gains (or losses), let it ride , sit on the sidelines, reinvest?
Let me apologize now. I am not trying to be evasive but my trading style, risk tolerance, and stock picks is particular to me and has changed. Your choices and philosophy is yours-own it.
The point is if you are buying or selling stock - any stock, you must have a view of the market as a whole going forward.
OK, I do. "Markets will go up and down. Stocks will go up and down" I am a fair UP market guy and mediocre Down market guy. I want to beat the Market when it is going up and not lose as much when the Market goes down. If I care a lot about the markets, I'd buy /sell an Index.
If you're buying and do not have a positive view of the market, you're making a big mistake.
Depends on what you are buying. In 2008, I should have been buying short indexes, just as GoldmanSachs was doing in against their CDO's. I don't care what the Market is doing-I only care what My Portfolio is doing. I would be pleased to get 2x the yield of 10 year Treasuries , ~5-8% in an down market. I would be happy to get 12+% in an up market. And be ecstatic to beat the SP500. Currently I am ecstatic. Do YOU think I should risk choosing a loser, a winner, or go neutral?
-- Edited by longprime on Friday 6th of September 2013 09:19:12 PM
-- Edited by longprime on Friday 6th of September 2013 09:20:08 PM
-- Edited by longprime on Friday 6th of September 2013 09:55:16 PM
I've heard the saying to cut your losses and let your winners run. How do you let your winners run when the stock is going up and down over the short term? How do you know if you're sitting on a loss that is going to get worse or reverse and go much higher?
How does one know the winners when its value goes up and down? How does one know a loser that will turn around? -- Conviction. More research and research that I don't have time for, knowledge of, or access to. But know that a fund manager is lucky to beat the SP500 or whatever index, and he is getting paid to do this and is paying for a lot of talent-information. I on the other hand am playing with my money and conviction is important.
I've heard it said that to make money you need to learn how to accept losses. Looks to me like you sold just before a breakout to 70.
You keep saying that I sold just before it broke out. Regrettably I sold before it broke out to 171, but I sold without knowing the future and I sold with a profit. I sold AAPL at 50 something, twice. Each time taking a 20 point loss. That is why sometimes its called gambling.
I've heard the saying to cut your losses and let your winners run. How do you let your winners run when the stock is going up and down over the short term? How do you know if you're sitting on a loss that is going to get worse or reverse and go much higher?
I've heard it said that to make money you need to learn how to accept losses. Looks to me like you sold just before a breakout to 70.
"I was willing to make a profit but I was not willing to take a loss. This is different from your statement." I don't see how. You were willing to take a $3 loss with a stop loss at 50. It looks like you went with your gut and not the rule that you set - the stop loss of 50 - why?
What made you sell tsla after only a 3 point gain? It looks like you were willing to potentially lose $3 to make $3. I don't know - what does Cramer think about tsla. Everybody seems to think its overpriced. Of course they have said the same thing about amazon.
"I was In at 53 and out at 56, in 3 days. I made 300 on an investment of 5300. My downside risk was minimal and at most a stop-loss at 50. Today TSLA low~165 and it is the same company with the same sales projections and the same automobile pricing. And if you sold at the high of ~171 you made a profit of 6 or about 3.6% ROI whereas I made a profit of 5.6% ."
but if you stayed in at 53 to 171 as opposed to selling in 3 days, you would have more than tripled your money.
It looks like you were willing to potentially lose $3 to make $3
I was willing to make a profit but I was not willing to take a loss. This is different from your statement.
I am however willing go negative on NWN because I think it is near the bottom and I hope to make 3. Taking a loss or profit implies that one has exited the position.
-- Edited by longprime on Thursday 5th of September 2013 05:41:55 PM
Sometimes. His advice basic manual is the same as most other people's advice. Can't go wrong in, "buy low-sell high"
Has it helped me be a better investor, Yes it has, because he always repeats the basics vs a book or seminar that are a once thru.
Let's take TSLA because I traded in it a few months ago because I may have read something about it on PopMech, SciAm, WSJ, or heard about it on TV-Radio, or I was just trying to be green. Maybe it was when Boeing and GM was having troubles with the lithium batteries that TSLA-Musk offered to give some "free" advice. ... I was In at 53 and out at 56, in 3 days. I made 300 on an investment of 5300. My downside risk was minimal and at most a stop-loss at 50. Today TSLA low~165 and it is the same company with the same sales projections and the same automobile pricing. And if you sold at the high of ~171 you made a profit of 6 or about 3.6% ROI whereas I made a profit of 5.6% .
For my portfolio, 100shares of TSLA @165 is Too rich and Too much capital in 1 stock with higher downside risk than upside risk-IMO. YMMV.
The second big issue I keep in mind is that I trade within a Traditional IRA. So all of the profits, dividends, and my initial contribution will be taxed at probably 22% Federal and whatever for State upto 9%. For any losses-I own 100%.
I have lost money in stocks; Maybe 3 of 5 of my picks have been losers, 1 of 5 moderate gain, and 1 of 5 big winners that made the other four look very sad. As tCC said, "outright gambling".
Go for sure things first-like a washlet bidet. The investment is $300. You can ponder the universe of stocks and get washed at the same time. Your ROI is in the savings for TP and trees which make the air you breathe while starving the microbes that consume oxygen to breakdown the cellulose.
First rule: Don't lose money you can't afford to lose.
exception to rule 1: A few times in life you got to "shoot-the-moon" Which I wish DS would do for a GF.
The best investment I have ever made is a washlet bidet. Less than $300. We use much,much less TP which we all know, has been getting more costly and smaller sheets. The device has been especially helpful in keeping our senior parents clean, without which we would not been able to keep my mother in her own home.
The second investment, not yet proven, is a 50cc scooter. Most of my solo driving is intown, <40 speed limit, and within 4 miles. If I am able to squeeze out another 3 years out of the 99Civic and cut the number of fill-ups on this car by 1/4th, I would be breaking even at year 3, and profit thereafter. The big IF is that I don't get into a major crackup.
I started at 41.25 and the low buy was at 40.42. No one can determine the low just as no one can know what is the high.
I am frustrated with Zillow, I've been exiting and then it goes up again by a 3 dollars. I like Zillow because it is disruptive, a new tool to the general public and to realtors. I first heard about Zillow from CC, a few years ago, it was featured on Mad Money, and DS recently started to work for them. Buy companies that are hiring. Currently my issue with Z is that the stock is parabolic and there seems to be no end to its upward tragectory-but it will stop, somewhere. I am out of Zillow, a bit too soon. I told spouse that we can afford gains but less able to afford losses.
Disclaimer: Most of my picks I lose money.
-- Edited by longprime on Wednesday 4th of September 2013 08:08:10 AM
disclaimer: YMMV. As the advertisement says, I trade My way.
I trade about 0-4x a week depending on the price of the stock and the amount of risk I want to take. NwN is my local gas utility and I use their gas not only for their gas but also the electricity generated from the gas purchased by Portland General, my electric utility, and who is phasing out the Boardman coal fired and installing peaking gas generated electricity at NWN gas storage location. Three of months ago NWN was high then summer comes along, the Fed says it will begin tapering, and x-div. I am using the same amount of gas, the same electricity, the only difference is the stock price. If I can get 5% ROI return in 6 months plus 1 or 2 dividends, I will pleased. That's a 12-14% annualized return with fairly low risk and if I only get the dividends, that is still a 4% yield.
I just looked at nwn. It looks like its had a bit of a rough time. I hope you bought it lower than where it is now. Do you buy and hold or do you trade a lot?
I typically invest companies that make the products that I buy and use-aka Warren Buffett.
NWN-because current yield is ~4.3%. Regulated gas utility that is state regulated and a nonregulated that is involved in gas purchase/sales in its storage facilities. It is cyclical and now at a low point.
I also have most of our retirement funds in guaranteed income fix and variable annuities. I pay high fees but I like the safety of annuities if the markets collapse. If I had these annuities in 2008, I would be miles and 10's of thousands ahead of our retirement mutual funds.
We have a small portion of retirement funds in cash-money market primarily for emergency use and could be tapped if the markets collapsed. Again if I had cash in 2008 rather in mutual funds, I wouldn't be 40% down as compared to 2007. I was a balanced mutual fund holder.
I also watch MAD MONEY-Jim Crammer on CNBC.
Disclaimer: Do not take my advice. I am not a professional. I have lost a lot of money. We are in retirement mode and caring for senior parents. We have Longterm Care insurance purchased when we were in our early 50's.
I have no idea what the pros think. I've been burned too many times. The small investor can generally beat the big funds because we don't roil the markets as the big boys do. We small investors
about 33% cash. But in our small accounts, 100 shares of Zillow can take cash way down fast. I'm up nearly 30% this year and want to preserve my gains but need to make more gains before I pull the cord in 5 years.
I missed the show, but that seems ridiculous. i pulled our credit reports a few months and started process of correcting erroneous info. I wonder how many folks have wrong stuff on their reports?
I thought the most important point of the 60 min show was that the credit report you get is not the same credit report sent to the banks who decide whether to give you a loan. That has to change and it looks like only the govt will be able to make that change.
Credit Reporting Companies, TransUnion, Experian. and Equifax, are three companies that I would like to see taken down more than a few notches. Congress will never right the wrongs that they do to you and me. I wonder if the many hundreds of dollars I spend to protect my credit from fraud is really worth the money-And if in fact 60 Minutes is correct in saying that these Companies are not correcting mistakes even though I am paying for their protection service-Then they are committing a BIG fraud.
dstark and BCEagle91 are missing in action from CC. I have not idea why they are no longer there. they had some pretty good posts on investing.
I talked to a friend last week who owns a Tesla and said the Tesla S is the best car she has ever owned. I wished I had talked to her six months ago. I would have bought TSLA and made big money.
I bought TSLA at ~53 and a few days later sold ~56. Which was a nice little run considering where it was in the previous month. A week later-BAM.
I was then eyeing it at ~90, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150. TSLA is a open sore for me this year.
Family friend in Beaverton OR says that he sees a few Teslas. Beaverton-Hillsboro, [Silicon Forest, Intel} is spreadout like SV and a vehicle is a must. OR also gives big tax credit while having a ~11% income tax for high wages vs 9% for normal people. OR also incentivized companies to install chargers.
Seattle is different.
-- Edited by longprime on Sunday 25th of August 2013 07:35:37 PM