Political & Elections

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: ACA on CC


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Apr 25, 2014
RE: ACA on CC
Permalink  
 


Goldenpooch must have crappy jobs or has too much wealth.  DS first job industry job was with a consulting co with big experience with HI. The offered preferred plan was the HSA.  If the employee wanted a better co-pays/deductible the additional cost was on him. The real benefit of HSA plans was the ability to set aside money to pay for the co-pays/deductibles for which the company gave dollars to fund the savings part.  His current company offered HSA but he decided that he already had too much in the HSA savings account and the standard plan he has a $10/paycheck prem and no deductibles (If I remember correctly, it is verry verry good).



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 660
Date: Apr 25, 2014
Permalink  
 

I've posted a few things from time to time.  I can't believe certain people have so much time on their hands to keep going on endlessly about that stuff.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Apr 25, 2014
Permalink  
 

Finally, Goldenpouch, revealed his previous HI plan, after 889 pages of posts.  What a jerk.  And if anyone wants to tell him that, tell him it's from me.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Mar 29, 2014
Permalink  
 

Now that I'm losing some investments, It's time to get back to ACA/ObamaCare. aww

CC: Premiums thread : Its March 29, and 3 days left plus whatever backlog remains after the 31st. enrollments approaching 7 million and close to  GAO/CMS

IMO, the Stupid Party, again shot themselves for a severe wound, when they badmouth ACA to no end in the waning months of 2013 and early 2014. Now, not a peep out of the Stupid Party on ObamaCare when they should be attacking without mercy. The  next ACA's open enrollment will be this fall and heavy advertisements will occur just as candidates for the 114th Congress,will be attacking each other and everything else.  Going to be a really battle 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 15, 2013
Permalink  
 

I want to talk about MONEY and investing.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 15, 2013
Permalink  
 

I am going to get mine.evileyebiggrin



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 123
Date: Nov 15, 2013
Permalink  
 

I think it got closed because it was getting harder to defend. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
Date: Nov 15, 2013
Permalink  
 

I posted a couple of things today that were not political and were deleted. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 543
Date: Nov 15, 2013
Permalink  
 

The ACA thread was finally closed and I had nothing to do with it. Darn, I should have posted more in the past few days to get some credit for killing that cheerleading session.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 3, 2013
Permalink  
 

 

That makes no sense.  I will take getting a cadillac plan any day over not having insurance and going to the ER.

Don't we all, but it is not how the statement was  intended  to be interpreted, IMO, Employer paid HI (especially the cadillac plans) is worse than "free" ER  and hospitalization to the less wealthy.

Fundamentally, I am against employer supplied HI: Because it breeds employee dependency-which is the same reason some politics want to dis-assemble government aid to the poor. It insulates the employee from the true cost of health care. It dis-incentives good entrepreneurial people from leaving and starting their own business and hiring people. It penalizes small business trying to turn a profit and hiring good workers because of employer HI benefit. It burdens the consumer/rate payer with costs unrelated to the function of the employee (see Autoworkers Union, Steelworkers, longshoreman, transportation workers, utility workers unions). It disencourages employers from hiring qualified but less than good health people. It encourages employers to purge their payrolls of unhealthy employees and older employees. I am sure good TP and RINOs can come up with more reasons, of which I would side with you. 

Some of the opponents of ObamaCare have been unions. Obama promised unions that they can "keep" their plans. Now it appears that employers may be tearing up contracts. Strange bedfellows we have in the Stupid Party and the Liar Party. confuse

I love the paradoxes. evileye



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 963
Date: Nov 3, 2013
Permalink  
 

Isn't odd that we have mandated Auto Insurance that has PIP (personal injury protection). liability, and Uninsured Motorist protection, in case we cause an injury in case either we or them are without HI.

Possibly, you've put your apple pie thumb on exactly the problem, lp. That sentence implies that getting sick, without means to pay for it, is eye to eye with buying a car and killing someone with it.

Existing and responsibility are two entirely different things.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
Date: Nov 3, 2013
Permalink  
 

A teaspoon of chia seeds each day are delicious and add fiber naturally. .  You can add them to cereal, shake, eat them raw or add to liquid. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 543
Date: Nov 3, 2013
Permalink  
 

longprime wrote:

IMO, Employer paid HI (especially the cadillac plans) is worse than "free" ER  and hospitalization to the less wealthy.


 That makes no sense.  I will take getting a cadillac plan any day over not having insurance and going to the ER.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 2, 2013
Permalink  
 

Thanks Win, for the idea of canned Peas. Mom needed a food with fiber. I had been using metamusil but peas are better. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 2, 2013
Permalink  
 

I particularly like Calmom's analysis. Boiled down to just gravy. 

http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/16534147-post3307.html

I've noticed that on cc, the phrase "the middle class" is generally used to refer to the "upper class". (We see this in the financial aid threads as well). Basically, the income distribution in this country will leave the lower economic third eligible for Medicaid (at least in the Medicaid expansion states); the middle third subsidy eligible; and the top third will not be eligible for subsidies. I realize that could be a significant hardship for the people who are on the lower end of the upper third -- there is a fairly steep drop off, especially for older people who are subject to higher insurance rates. However, that hardship is nothing compared to the people in the lower third in the non-Medicaid expansion states, who have simply been left out in the cold by their state governments. (As a practical matter they can qualify for subsidies by simply lying about their anticipated 2014 income, but no one is going to tell them that, so I am thinking that only a small percentage will be savvy enough to figure that out.)

Most people in the upper third are already enjoying subsidies for insurance. They are not taxed on their employers' contributions to their health care. They are more likely to be homeowners who can itemize deductions than the lower two-thirds, and as noted they can deduct all medical expenses over 10% of their AGI, including excess health insurance premiums. They also are more likely to have enough discretionary income to fund and HSA, which essentially lets them deduct their pretty much their full insurance deductible whether they use it or not. So they GET subsidies,, they just get their subsidies in a different way.

DS left a job this year with a large consulting firm to the health industry. His contribution was $10/biweek and $5 copay. I can't remember his Out-of-pocket costs. Covered, medical, prescription, vision, and dental. On the corporate side, the company got to expense out the insurance. On the employee side, he got really good HI at very low cost. 

IMO, Employer paid HI (especially the cadillac plans) is worse than "free" ER  and hospitalization to the less wealthy.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
Date: Nov 2, 2013
Permalink  
 

I am sort of surprised my posts have not been deleted on ACA. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 543
Date: Nov 2, 2013
Permalink  
 

I just had another post deleted on the ACA thread. I wrote that I agreed with actingmt that calmom's post was political and then I wrote about the difference between redistributing insurance risk and redistributing income and that insurance should redistribute risk but not income. I am waiting to see if I get another infraction.

The ACA is clearly a political thread and as long as the socialists list calmom post they are free to express their political opinions but the rest of us can't.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 2, 2013
Permalink  
 

Perhaps, RS, you could post here, before you post overthere? confuse

The ACA is clearly a political thread and as long as the socialists list calmom post they are free to express their political opinions but the rest of us can't. 

 would get you Banned. Me, I would've said, " Better Socialist than be dead without HI. "



-- Edited by longprime on Saturday 2nd of November 2013 10:15:52 AM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

Win, your posts are too long. 

Too bad about Mr Goldhill's father. Happened 2+ years ago. NOT under ObamaCare and I am not sure if ObamaCare addresses this issue. I can't remember if ACA addresses hospitalization outcomes. 

As for that can of peas-It is an inferior product. I haven't eaten a can of peas in decades. My first profession was food processing. Today that can has a good chance of: steel  made in China, formed in China, shipped on China ships, received at a China own terminal. And the liner of full of BPA. The peas may have been grown in the USA but there is also a good possibility for the peas being grown in Tasmania and canned in Tasmania, and then the peas being too mature for the higher margined frozen product. 

Row crops is a marginal product for the grower. 30years ago, growers used row crops as part of crop rotation to grain which paid more and could be hedged in the financial markets. Row crop growers got paid over 1-2 years sharing the production risk with the processor. 

The free market is great. The free market has dictated that canned peas does not make money for anybody in the supply line. I truly doubt that you can today find a can of peas at your grocer. 

HI is not a free market product. HI is forced to retain adversed clients and there is a lack of price competition because the client pool is the same for company-ie people looking for insurance. Once you have HI there is no real incentive to change that insurance.  I doubt that you have shopped for personal insurance and if you had, you would see that the rates are within dollars of each other for exactly the same coverage and deductible. And if you had shopped, you filled out a 10 page health questionaire of which any question could disqualify you. I personally like the question 1 & 2. -Have you ever applied for HI and Have you ever been denied HI? Doesn't really matter if you answer because the application allows the HI company to check the Medical Insurance Information Exchange (forgot the exact name).



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 543
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

Exactly right Hope.  They are big supporters of ACA.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 697
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

Longprime your post about your coverage options precisely proves my point: Government regulation/control of insurance and health care industries are suffocating. They incentivize the exact wrong things and in the long run make matters much, much worse, not better.

See How American Health Care Killed My Father, by David Goldhill, in The Atlantic.

Or, in lieu of that article, here's a short illustration/synopsis of it:

The next time you go to the supermarket, look closely at a can of peas. Think about all the work that went into it-the farmers, truckers, and supermarket employees, the miners and metalworkers who made the can-and think how miraculous it is that you can buy this can for under a dollar. At every step of the way, competition among suppliers rewarded those whose innovations shaved a penny off the cost of getting that can to you. If God is commonly thought to have created the world and then arranged it for our benefit, then the free market (and its invisible hand) is a pretty good candidate for being a god. You can begin to understand why libertarians sometimes have a quasi-religious faith in free markets.

Now let's do the devil's work and spread chaos throughout the marketplace. Suppose that one day all prices are removed from all products in the supermarket. All labels too, beyond a simple description of the contents, so you can't compare products from different companies. You just take whatever you want, as much as you want, and you bring it up to the register. The checkout clerk scans in your food insurance card and helps you fill out your itemized claim. You pay a flat fee of $10 and go home with your groceries. A month later you get a bill informing you that your food insurance company will pay the supermarket for most of the remaining cost, but you'll have to send in a check for an additional $15.It might sound like a bargain to get a cartload of food for h5, but you're really paying your grocery bill every month when you fork over $2,000 for your food insurance premium.

Under such a system, there is little incentive for anyone to find innovative ways to reduce the cost of food or increase its quality. The supermarkets get paid by the insurers, and the insurers get their premiums from you. The cost of food insurance begins to rise as supermarkets stock only the foods that net them the highest insurance payments, not the foods that deliver value to you.

As the cost of food insurance rises, many people can no longer afford it. Liberals (motivated by Care) push for a new government program to buy food insurance for the poor and the elderly. But once the government becomes the major purchaser of food, then success in the supermarket and food insurance industries depends primarily on maximizing yield from government payouts. Before you know it, that can of peas costs the government $30, and all of us are paying 25 percent of our paychecks in taxes just to cover the cost of buying groceries for each other at hugely inflated costs.

That, says Goldhill, is what we've done to ourselves. As long as consumers are spared from taking price into account-that is, as long as someone else is always paying for your choices-things will get worse. We can't fix the problem by convening panels of experts to set the maximum allowable price for a can of peas. Only a working market can bring supply, demand, and ingenuity together to provide health care at the lowest possible price. - The Righteous Mind, pages 354-355, paperback version.


Obamacare in particular, and liberalism in general, exacerbate the exact problems they attempt to solve.

-- Edited by winchester on Friday 1st of November 2013 07:48:47 AM

__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

my apples are too ripe and most of them mush on precooking. Essentially precook apples, add starch-juice and fold until gelatinize. Pour into shell and bake 350 for 35  minutes for 1 pie, 40 minutes for 2 pies.  I use butter for crust. 

Love blueberries. 

Other than taking care of Mom, I got pies and pulling ACA chains. biggrinbiggrin

 evileye



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

Pillsbury pie crust. 

Apple pie filling. 

Bake. 

i have never been successful baking pies from scratch. Cakes, yes. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

Sorry, I had to go home to fix the doorbell.

Hope, I am the mad wizard in the forest. I supply pies to my clients who probably use them in nafarious purposes. I don't ask.

It is odd that I support ACA in that it gives me more choices and gets me off of the Welfare system, which I really don't need but that is how the previous system was set up. Can ACA be improved, yes. But remember ACA is supposed to replace Medicare and give affordable HI to more Americans and forces those Americans to get insurance rather than take advantage of the system. 

Isn't odd that we have mandated Auto Insurance that has PIP (personal injury protection). liability, and Uninsured Motorist protection, in case we cause an injury in case either we or them are without HI. 

Now that I own and ride a put-put scooter, and wear a helmet, I came across a couple of bikers (at the state capitol building) who were protesting the mandatory wearing of a DOT helmet. Question, Is the helmet primarily for the protection of the biker or for the protection of the HI rate payer and care facilities? 

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1124
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 8,879
 
Moderator's Note

Again, if you are here to post supporting and opposing posts about ACA, this thread is not for you. This is not an opinion thread.

Hohoho ho. Like all of Calmom's and dstark's andmany others' posts are not supporting ACA? Hilarious.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1124
Date: Nov 1, 2013
Permalink  
 

I think it's about time you posted your recipe, lp.

i made one Sunday with Macouns and Empires. Something was lacking. I use only sugar, cinnamon and a bit of nutmeg. I do butter crust. This one just wasn't up to my staNdards, not enough cinnamon maybe.

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1124
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

Whoa. That is some recipe. too complex for me, kind of like your investing advice. smile

My mom did sliced apples, sugar, cinnamon. 2 tbsp flour, and lard crust.

i do sliced apples, sugar, cinnamon, nutmeg, 2 tbsp flour, and butter crust.  She used macs, but I think macs get too mushy. I like the apples to have some bite.

oh well, apple pies are not my best, my strawberry-rhubarb and my blueberry ones are much better. Or maybe I just like them more. 

 

 



-- Edited by hope on Friday 1st of November 2013 07:07:16 AM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

Hope, wife and I are scratch cooks. Wife is 100x better than me.  No two of any prepared food are alike. Apple filling: Randomly Diced fresh apples. 2 tbs flour, 2tbs tapioca starch. about 1/4 cup of any fruit drink/juice to suspend starch/flour and to add acidity which controls browning of apples. Cook cut apples till soft. fold liquid/starch to hot apples. Apples this year are sweet but lacking in acidity so you will need to experiment with type of juice and amount to achieve a good flavor and taste balance. We have a few apple trees and scavenge gravensteins that I spray. Raspberries are from a neighbor that they don't bother to harvest and blackberries or wild in our land.



-- Edited by longprime on Thursday 31st of October 2013 08:41:50 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

Too many points to consider, Win. 

I don't fundamentally disagree with you, However in my own circumstance, where I had insurance but was forced to the open market, I was denied HI. Only thru Medicaid was I able to enroll for HI, but at a relatively high dollar. I kinda like to be in the general HI population rather than the assigned risk pool. 

Gotta run, making apple pies: up to 22. Today it will be 26.evileye



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 697
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

Here’s the rest of the quote from previous comment:

When libertarians [and conservatives] talk about the miracle of "spontaneous order" that emerges when people are allowed to make their own choices (and take on the costs and benefits of those choices), the rest of us should listen. Care and compassion sometimes motivate liberals to interfere in the workings of markets, but the result can be extraordinary harm on a vast scale. (Of course, as I said above, governments often need to intervene to correct market distortions, thereby making markets work properly.) Liberals want to use government for so many purposes, but health care expenses are crowding out all other possibilities. If you think your local, state, and federal governments are broke now, just wait until the baby boom generation is fully retired.

I find it ironic that liberals generally embrace Darwin and reject "intelligent design" as the explanation for design and adaptation in the natural world, but they don't embrace Adam Smith as the explanation for design and adaptation in the economic world. They sometimes prefer the "intelligent design" of socialist economies, which often ends in disaster from a utilitarian point of view.



__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 697
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

So, if the Stupid Party, succeeds in defunding ObamaCare; Do we go back to the socialist, welfared (redundant term) Medicaid that was breaking the entire HI system?
Well let’s see. If we think for HALF A SECOND what other options might exist?

-Jeopardy Music-

How about, oh, I don’t know, SOMETHING MARKET BASED MAYBE?!!!!

Let’s see, are there any real-world examples of what market-based health care does to costs?

-More Jeopardy Music-

How about laser eye surgery?

there is an open market for LASIK surgery (a kind of laser eye surgery that removes the need to wear contact lenses). Doctors compete with one another to attract customers, and because the procedure is rarely covered by insurance, patients take price into account. Competition and innovation have driven down the price of the surgery by nearly 80 percent since it was first introduced. (Other developed nations have had more success controlling costs, but they too face rapidly rising costs that may become fiscally ruinous. Like America, they often lack the political will to raise taxes or cut services.) - Haidt, "The Righteous Mind," (but only because it's at hand. Other sources have made the same suggestion)

But even at 80% savings people still have to pay for the other 20%. How might they do that?

Any ideas? Anyone?

1) High deductible (which drives a market-based health care system), low premium (which makes it AFFORDABLE, get it?) health insurance that covers big ticket costs, in combination with...
2) ... a Health Care Savings Account - sort of like an IRA, that’s not use-or-lose, and lets a person build up cash from year to year – which can then be used to pay the premiums and out of pocket expenses.



__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 697
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

1) What lead us to ACA?

Answer: Pathological, we-know-better-than-you, it's-for-your-own-good, nanny-state, morally-myopic, "altruism."



__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

SOMETHING MARKET BASED MAYBE

Let's see now. What do you have, had, want to have.  

Prior to ObamaCare:

I had 1 choice= employer group health. (3 companies, 2 deductibles each)

After RIF, I had 3 choices=1) No insurance, 2) chose my own insurance 3)COBRA. Had I known what I know now, I would have gotten my own personal insurance and skipped COBRA. 

After COBRA, I had 0 choice=pre-existing condition

But the insurance companies (all of them, 4 companies available) referred to me to public assistance (Oregon Medical Insurance Pool (OMID)).=2 choices, 1)don't take plan or 2) take the Plan with no choice in deductibles.

Following year, 10% increase in premium.

Third year on OMID, 2.5 options, 1) No insurance, 2) $2500 deductible or $500 deductible, and the $2500 deductible was 10% higher than previous year that had $500 deductible.

Which now brings us to 2014= 1) No insurance, 2)-68) 67 plans over 6 companies. Total of 68 choices, NONE of which are taxpayer or government subsidized. I also know that at least 1 of the companies, include my doctor. 

For verification purposes, age 63, M, nontribal Indian, individual. Marion co.  www.coveroregon.com

 

Pray tell me what do you have currently and your choices in 2014.



-- Edited by longprime on Thursday 31st of October 2013 05:09:46 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 123
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

longprime, we first need to get the Lying Out My Ass Party to come clean with the reality of their solution to the healthcare issue.  Only then can we have a meaningful discussion about what to do.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

The Stupid Party is in a corner. What ever alternative(s) that good Rinos or TPs have, those issues cannot be brought to the floor because  the Stupid Party-TP has radicalized the issues. 



-- Edited by longprime on Thursday 31st of October 2013 10:06:21 AM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 31, 2013
Permalink  
 

In Oregon we have an exemption to Medicaid, much like Mass has. However, our welfare system is/was an allocated, rationed, prioritized program devised by our good ER doctor, Gov John Kitzhaber. Our program is opposite of Mass in that the State of OR doles out the medical access and only the most venerable is given subsidized insurance vs MA the individual has a subsidized insurance program but everyone is insured. Which is better?

MEDICARE was already breaking USA budget. It had to change. Again the issue really is that the Stupid Party did not introduce their conservative Heritage/Romney plan but allowed newly elected PBO that honor. A blanket denial of ObamaCare is a losing issue for the Stupid Party because too many Americans will know that they have been denied "affordable" as affordable can be, and too many Rinos as me, am tired of people thinking that they can get FREE welfare healthcare. 

As we get closer to elections in 2014, more and more people will realize that absent an alternative to ObamaCare, the Stupid Party is being irresponsible in a attacking program without any alternatives. 



-- Edited by longprime on Thursday 31st of October 2013 09:55:34 AM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 31, 2013
RE: ACA Scene 2-Insurance Premiums
Permalink  
 


so, Razor, you made me look. 

So many anecdotes without basis of figures and facts. Everyone rants and raves about the bad or good parts of someone else's plan but without stating any substantial figures. Goldenpooch (Geeps) is upset about loosing a not so good HI to be forced to go another not so good plan. 

10/30/2013 on CNBC, Santelli, introduced a young lady, contract graphic designer, who said that she is barely making it now, and upset about having to either buy ACA insurance or be penalize. She said that she cannot afford either. She said that if she purchased the cheapest plan, the deductible is so high that she would never get the benefit of the insurance. She said that she is healthy and that she doesn't need HI. 

So, I hear this a lot. A rhetoric of the Stupid Party's mantra.  Is the Stupid Party so dense to ask 2 questions: 1) What lead us to ACA and 2) What is Insurance? and how does this involve young people?  So if we answer these 2 questions, we can see that ACA is really a good Republican idea, and the alternative is just pure, unadulterated, economy sucking, individual initiative  killing, SOCIALISM. Which is exactly why good, LDS,  Gov Mitt Romney, initiated Mass. HI plan. 

So, if the Stupid Party, succeeds in defunding ObamaCare; Do we go back to the socialist, welfared (redundant term)  Medicaid that was breaking  the entire HI system? 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 543
Date: Oct 30, 2013
RE: ACA on CC
Permalink  
 


What a bunch of jerks they are at CC.

When the old thread was closed (for no good reason) I wrote in the new thread whose title said "not political" that the new thread was no more or less political than the old thread. Obviously my comment was about the closing of the old thread and the merits of the new thread. Terwitt however, couldn't figure out the obvious. He/she gave me an infraction for making a political comment. My comment wasn't about politics it was about whether the thread was political or not. I asked terwitt to rescind my infraction but if course I get ignored. Here is what he/she wrote:

Dear razorsharp,

You have received an infraction at College Confidential.

Reason: bringing in politics
-------
You've been around CC long enough to know that your post was inflammatory and unnecessary.
-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

All the best,
College Confidential

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 30, 2013
Permalink  
 

Just do it and tell the mods that they are a bunch of sh--heads. I did. I always speak the truth. biggrinevileye



-- Edited by longprime on Wednesday 30th of October 2013 10:11:12 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 30, 2013
New Game
Permalink  
 


I like my [company, service, person], Until it/they/I [insert comment].

disbelief



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 30, 2013
RE: ACA on CC
Permalink  
 


 

Agreed. Blankmind. 

The current controversy on "keeping your insurance" and "keep your doctor" is a bit naive on the part of the insurance buying public. We keep both ONLY IF, the insurer/employer desires to offer the same plan and the doctor subscribes to that insurance company's payment.  hmm

I liked my old HI insurance company, Until the employer decided to push more of the expenses on to the employee.

I liked my old Auto insurance company, Until the insurance company decided to drop me. 

I like my home owner's insurance until the insurance company didn't like I was in flood zone, hurricane prone area, tsunami zone, earthquakes, tornados, and forest-wild fires. 

And on UrbanBaby, I loved my ex, until he divorced me for a younger woman. biggrin

PBO may be naive to think that ACA will work, but USA could not sustain the old Mediaid and ER care system when the primary users had no incentive to seek and buy HI. On the reverse side, How long can businesses, employers sustain HI benefits on their group plans? If anything, ACA is a Republican initiated program because it pushes responsibility for HI unto the individual and away from employers.  But the Stupid Party has taken a position against ACA (cannot understand how Romney was opposed to his own plan) primarily because it wasn't their plan. And because this opposition, small businesses and big employers are going to withhold contributions to the Conservative Party absent an viable alternative and old system was failing and was failing fast. confuse

evileye

 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 123
Date: Oct 30, 2013
Permalink  
 

Giving people one sided information is UnAmerican. We have seen the results of unbalanced information and influence to be detrimental to America.

Yes, longprime.  One might even say that this is the reason we have the current president that we do.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 543
Date: Oct 30, 2013
Permalink  
 

The CC thread got closed. It has been a political thread since the beginning. How it stayed open so long is crazy. It was funny watching the koolaid drinkers trying to defend that piece of crap legislation. I am so glad Obama is finally being exposed as the liar he is and the plan is crashing as the Republicans predicted. I have to wonder if the Nov elections will be affected and Dems will lose. If this fiasco had happened last year we would have Pres Romney.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1124
Date: Oct 30, 2013
Permalink  
 

Yep. We sure have. Barack "if you like your plan, you can keep it,if you like your doctor You can keep him, no exceptions, period" Obama's one-sided information for the last 4 years is Un-American. Who knew, however, that the very same people who voted for this guy,  based on his promises, are now being deemed stupid for believing him.

Hey, maybe there are some Republican stupid party voters here in the making. :)



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2549
Date: Oct 29, 2013
Permalink  
 

Just tuned in to Kudlow Report (CNBC) who is continuing to bash ACA-Obamacare. Hospice social worker just left. Nice young lady, May be for DS?

 Kudlow was talking about ObamaCare will/may cause you to lose your doctor. Jeez, Mom has been thru 3 doctors this year, and she is on Kaiser P. She is going to get another doctor on Hospice. 

I don't mind criticism but when something as big as ACA, please give everyone the ability to make up their own minds using balanced arguments. Giving people one sided information is UnAmerican. We have seen the results of unbalanced information and influence to be detrimental to America. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1124
Date: Oct 28, 2013
Permalink  
 

I can't believe what is being posted over there as gospel...and does Calmom have a job? Or is promoting O-Care her job? She has a blog about it I think I read in one post.

i remember I followed Calmom's advice about taking the ACT instead of the SAT initially. Turned out to be the wrong thing to do for my son. For years when my sons were applying to college I read her advice about packaging kids, and realized when the process was over how it could really lead naive parents astray. Also her posts about how Barnard is Columbia. Silly. Luckily these so-called experts don't seem to post much about college over there anymore.

Reader (and buyer) beware.

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1124
Date: Oct 28, 2013
Permalink  
 

That's interesting, Samurai. Yeah, the timing was poor since it coincided with my S developing a blood clot two weeks prior, hospitalization, and diagnosis with APS. He went in and took the ACT like a trooper. Our initial college search relied on those results (which were ok, not great) and misled us for awhile, til he did great on the SAT. Just a waste of time for the poor kid at that point! 

I was just reminded of all that the more Calmom goes on and on..and on. :)

 

Just looked this up. Wow, sure you are right!

http://www.webmd.com/health-insurance/20130815/obamacare-state-navigator-organizations-announced

 



-- Edited by hope on Monday 28th of October 2013 04:34:43 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
Date: Oct 28, 2013
Permalink  
 

I am starting to wonder if she is a "Navigator". 

Like all advice, buyer should always beware. 

For the ACT, I tend to see better results for girls taking ACT, then boys.  Your mileage may differ, but working with teenagers, This has been my result.  I tell girls to take ACT first and boys to take SAT first. See how they do. Then take the other test.  See what feels better for them. 



-- Edited by SamuraiLandshark on Monday 28th of October 2013 04:43:14 PM



-- Edited by SamuraiLandshark on Monday 28th of October 2013 04:43:48 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 963
Date: Oct 27, 2013
Permalink  
 

Hard as it is getting men to commit, and women being as practical as they are, the state of marriage didn't really need another reason not to visit it.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
Date: Oct 27, 2013
Permalink  
 

I see people all the time who try to game the financial aid system to help ay for college. It rarely works as well as they hope, but every now and again a divorcwd famiky ends up with more aid then they should reasonably get.  There will always be winnerscand losers with the system as structured, 

with ACA, it is too early to tell, but if less income means lower costs, you can bet some families will opt to bring in lower income. 

 

 



__________________
1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard