bd, I didn't even notice them lol. The girl's face went from "Yeah! Santorum!" to "er. uh. awkward... time to leave..." in less than 3 seconds. Impressive.
He should have just clarified, professionally, what he was talking about. Reporters do that all the time, politicians do that all the time, even Santorum.
What was the yuck factor for me (and I realized that I'm biased because I don't like him), was watching him berate the reporter, who had merely asked one basic question that he could have easily clarified. Of course he knew the cameras were on him, and he was doing this manufactured outrage for the spotlight. Watching the young people behind him become uncomfortable, you could just see them cringing. I saw this and thought, "Man, what a dick this guy is!" I do not think this helped him with undecideds.
Also, I think he made a major gaff with the English comment with regards to Puerto Rico. I think he shot himself in the foot. Furthermore, many states don't have English as their official language... should we get rid of them? (rhetorical) Many Republicans from Puerto Rico think that it (language issues) should be left to the states. Don't Republicans believe in more state control rather than federal control anyway? In that case, it would make sense for Republicans to argue for languages to be determined by the state. I also *believe* that most of their national government operates using English primarily anyway. I'm not particularly bothered by what he said, I just think he screwed up with that one.
This particular issue is not one that I have paid much attention to. I am not familiar with the specific arguments that are being made.
But my feeling is that Romani's sense of the matter is right.
Yes, Republicans - actually I should probably say conservatives - do believe in more state control, and yes, it would make sense for them to argue for languages to be determined by the state.
Republicans are also sometimes susceptible to the (in my view, incorrect) tendency to look to the national goverment as the solution to everything.
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain
I was free associating Ann Romney affinity to grits and Santorum's extemporus comments.
BTW, I really hated grits when I was young. Mom always made the stuff as concrete, tasted like concrete. It was only until DW made grits/cream of wheat,rice,/couscous with milk, egg, in a consistency of a thick soup, did I really enjoy the stuff.
I'm starting to get some really good pineapple lately, which is holding me over till the good stuff comes. My favorite, though, is pomegranates, and they don't start coming out till October or later. Yay for the watermelon and catfish, grits are gross, I'm married to a southerner so I also have a particular affinity for the south....but what does that have to do with Santorum?
Missed the shirtless Santorum pictures though, talking about gross. I'd rather eat grits than look at unappealing pictures. Wonder why the media is so obsessed with that kind of stuff anyways, maybe it sells papers. I agree that was a major gaffe with the English language argument. How rude to go down to Puerto Rico and make a big stink about that. I thought maybe he knew he was going to lose anyways, so was trying to appeal to people outside of Puerto Rico. They always vote down statehood anyways, don't they?
I was listening to Santorum as part of an anthropology paper (we were told to listen to a politician and write a mini-ethnography paper on his/her speech... our professor recommended that we listen to someone we don't agree with so that we don't get caught up in the rhetoric and could be objective.) I picked Santorum because I figure if I could be objective with him then I could be objective with anyone/any culture I study (and I'm proud of myself... I wrote an extremely objective paper).
I burst into a laughing fit though when even my boyfriend (who voted for McCain btw) looked at the tv and said, "Oh just shut up already!"
While I'm on here: what is this obsession with his shirtless picture? Why do we care? I didn't care when they took pictures of Obama in Hawaii and I don't care about Santorum's sunbathing pictures. Good for him for enjoying the sun. I read two articles that called it "Shirtlessgate". Are you kidding me?! Why did it deserve a front page story on AOL? Not a dig at Santorum, just a dig at how ridiculous the media is and how ridiculous voters are that care about this one way or the other.
Also, I think he made a major gaff with the English comment with regards to Puerto Rico. I think he shot himself in the foot. Furthermore, many states don't have English as their official language... should we get rid of them? (rhetorical) Many Republicans from Puerto Rico think that it (language issues) should be left to the states. Don't Republicans believe in more state control rather than federal control anyway? In that case, it would make sense for Republicans to argue for languages to be determined by the state. I also *believe* that most of their national government operates using English primarily anyway. I'm not particularly bothered by what he said, I just think he screwed up with that one.
Wow, I'm listening to Santorum's interview with Greta van Sustern, after listening to his "concession" speech, what a nasty little man. Complain, gripe, backstab, exaggerate....yuck. He is very, very unappealing. Got to hear about his coal miner grandfather again. How the people that influenced him were coal miners and factory workers (apparently not his parents). How he decided to run, though it was not the right thing to do for his family, ....for us. For freedom. I think I got the gist of it correctly.
Sorry to you Santorum lovers, but this guy just makes me nauseous. Or maybe it was that third muffin.
I wish this whole flap about birth control would just go away. All these states with Republican legislatures trying to pass laws about insurance companies not being required to pay for bc? Crazy. This is a losing issue. Sure, I can certainly see the point about not forcing religious organizations to pay for it. But.....I keep hearing about the bills they are trying to pass, and I'm thinking---BIRTH CONTROL? Are you kidding me? Way to lose female votes. Don't even touch it or talk about it. In 2012, birth control pills, even for birth control purposes, are not controversial. Change the subject, because this just validates people's thoughts about religious conservatives. Which makes it even more likely that if Santorum is the nominee (or even the VP), Obama wins. He shouldn't even bring up the subject of birth control.
Yep, romani, I seem to hear Santorum bringing up his coal miner grandfather every time I listen to him speak. Sigh.
I really just get angry when I listen to him speak
Romani, I'm going to ask a serious question about this, but all I ask is that you think about it. I don't ask that you answer it here. (But if you want to, it goes without saying that you're free and welcome to do so.)
The phenomenon you're experiencing is common, and it happens among people of all political stripes. The recently released book "The Righteous Mind" does a very good job of explaining why this happens. I highly recommend it.
Every person, and every political philosophy, holds certain values to be 'sacred.' This does not imply religious belief, it simply implies core values that are considered inviolable. Usually, when we have the visceral reaction you're speaking of, it is because one or more of our sacred values is being violated. In other words, the negative visceral reaction is an emotional, intuitive response to sacrilege (again, not to imply religion, only to imply violation of sacralized values). There's a great video presentation on this topic, called "When Compassion Leads to Sacrilege," here: http://ccare.stanford.edu/content/jonathan-haidt-when-compassion-leads-sacrilege
I get the same feeling you do whenever I hear Obama's voice. His connotations of the words "fair" and "just" and "equal" are in direct violation of what I, and most conservatives, consider to be the true meanings - the sacred values - of those words.
So, here's my question: Which of your sacred values are being violated to cause this reaction in you? Can you name them? Can you do this succinctly?
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain
Ha! Romani that's a great answer. I really like it. No offense taken in the least.
Not everything has to have a rational explanation. If you like chocolate ice cream better than vanilla then you just do; No explanation or rationale is necessary. Sometimes "just because" or "it happens" or something similar is the perfect response.
-- Edited by winchester on Friday 16th of March 2012 03:48:30 PM
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain
winchester, I can listen to most Republicans. Santorum just gets under my skin.
Probably how he talks about women, directly and indirectly. Or public education. There's a number of things.
No offense, but I really don't care to learn what it is about him that I don't like. I just don't like him. I don't like what he says, how he says it, etc. It's not a debate I'd like to have... he just makes me angry. It happens :)
-- Edited by romanigypsyeyes on Friday 16th of March 2012 03:02:52 PM
lp, I was assuming it was some sort of autism. That's still a "special needs" child in my book. While my cousin's condition is much more severe than I'm assuming your BIL's condition is, it still takes a special person to raise a special needs child of any severity.
My apologies if it sounded like I thought your BIL had a genetic condition. Rereading it, I realize that is what it sounded like haha, but from your description I assumed autism of some sort. This is why I shouldn't post when tired.
bd, after the two contraception threads on cc, I just didn't want to reopen a can of worms about pregnancy and the like. I just want to steer clear of reproductive issues for a while haha.
I hadn't heard of him saying he was from coal miners or whatever. I really just get angry when I listen to him speak so I'm not allowed to watch him anymore because I get too irritated.
bd, I don't think he's going away. Gingrich SHOULD after tonight, and if anything I think that will help Santorum.
Maybe it'll be undecided at the convention and we'll see a surprise nomination of someone (I'm totally kidding, Romney will be the nominee if it's undecided still by convention time).
Is there even a slight chance that Santorum would be the VP nominee? I can't imagine it, but then again I still can't figure out why they picked Palin.
"I didn't want to bring up the fact that having children in your 40s dramatically increases the chance of having a child with genetic abnormalities considering that their youngest child is dying of a genetic condition. It would sound too much like I was blaming the mother and I don't want to get flamed."
I don't think anyone should flame you. The truth is the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be. You have kids when you're older, the risks go up, that's just the way it is. People make a choice.
"Looks like his dad was a clinical psychologist and mom was a nurse for the VA. It also looks like their housing was provided by the VA."
Honestly, I'm sick of hearing about his grandfather the coal miner. Give me a break! How about his parents being well paid professionals, and himself making millions of dollars out of congress? Don't hear him talking about that. Jeez, it's like me constantly bringing up that my grandfather was a farmer and a fisherman. Leaving out that my parents were engineers and my profession. Just catering and sucking up to the voters. Every time I look at Santorum, I think well, if he's the candidate, it's 100% certain that we have 4 more years of Obama. I sure wish this guy would just go away.
I didn't want to bring up the fact that having children in your 40s dramatically increases the chance of having a child with genetic abnormalities considering that their youngest child is dying of a genetic condition. It would sound too much like I was blaming the mother and I don't want to get flamed.
I have a lot of thoughts and opinions about mothers having children at that age, but as that's a debate I'd rather avoid, I'll shut up now.
lp, it takes some very special people to take in a child like that. Hugs to you and your family. I have a close family member with severe Smith-Magenis Syndrome and I have enormous respect for anyone who has raised a special needs child, especially when that child is not even your "own" (for lack of a better phrase after midnight).
-- Edited by romanigypsyeyes on Tuesday 13th of March 2012 09:24:14 PM
My dad was a MD at the State's home for genetic disabilities. If you have children after 40, the incidence of birth defects increase dramatically as you get older.
MIL had her last, ~43, and that child is living with us, borderline, uncommunicative, and possibly dangerous. He is uncommunicative to his parents.
-- Edited by longprime on Tuesday 13th of March 2012 07:42:46 PM
Looks like his dad was a clinical psychologist and mom was a nurse for the VA. It also looks like their housing was provided by the VA.
I won't pretend to know how much either of those positions make within the VA.
Also- I didn't realize that he was that old (no, I'm not calling him old, I just thought he was younger). His wife had her last child when she was ~47. I just could not imagine having a child at that age. Not that it's old, but I just couldn't imagine being in my mid-late 60s when my child graduated high school- I would be too afraid of not being able to adequately take care of my child at that age. Not criticizing (I do disapprove of having that children at that age in general but that's not my decision to make or my place to criticize her as I do not know her or the situation), just can't personally imagine it.
-- Edited by romanigypsyeyes on Tuesday 13th of March 2012 04:50:24 PM
"Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, whose humble coal-country biography is central to his political message, made more than $3.6 million in recent years as a Washington consultant and claimed a German luxury sedan as a business expense, according to tax returns released by his campaign.
Santorum’s growing wealth after leaving Congress could complicate his attempt to focus on his history as the grandson of a hardscrabble coal miner, particularly as the GOP nomination race narrows to a contest between him and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, a former private-equity manager."
Actually, I am disgusted at most if not all politicians.
How much were the Obamas worth before the White House and how much are they worth now?
Caring for children born with such a serious disorders that involve so much hospitaliztion and surgeries and illnesses, with no hope of cure, brings up the question of when does it cross over into just torture for the child? I wouldn't pretend to be able to answer the question but is quality of life something that should be considered? Are the parents' desires to get every moment they can with their child selfish if it only prolongs the suffering of the child? No one should answer these questions for other people, but I know I would struggle with them.
I could only get speaking engagements if I crash an airplane or have what we call a "Sully" moment. Neither of which I'd like to do. Nor would I want to speak to the press at any time, as they mangle anything you try to say. I think the politicians in earlier times had it alot easier, now they have a camera in their face every moment, with someone just waiting for that opportunity for them to slip up or make a comment they can slice up to make them look bad.
And actually, about 1/3 of the flying I do is as a passenger, because my airline leaves airplanes all over the place and sends us there to pick them up. Thankfully it's almost always first class, because I fly so often with the same airline. I have found a method that works, wearing comfortable clothes, always earplugs, have an interesting book, project, movie or laptop. And most importantly, make sure and drink a sufficient amount of wine so it's takes the edge off of listening to that crying baby, or sniffing, yapping passenger next to you. You know when you have a toddler who bangs and kicks on the back of your seat the entire flight? With a glass of wine or two, I can pretend it's a back massage.
You should get the $50K speaking engagements. And the press corps anxiously awaiting your arrival.
Look at the bright side. At least you get to fly the plane most of the time.
Think of the priority seating and not having to pay for your luggage, or bopping the head of the person as you drag your carryon down the aisle and put in the overhead bin.
"but for politicians, they have a different lens about what they think is appropriate than most of us. That's why they are wiling to spend countless hours on buses, planes, eating crappy hotel food and living out of a suitcase - all in the nature of running for political office. It sounds like a horrific scene to me just getting there."
Hey, that sounds like my life. But I don't get those $50K a pop speaking tours afterwards. Nope, I don't understand wanting to be a politician either. Maybe a small time one where you can fix local problems, but all the scrutiny and face time on tv? Yuck. I heard part of that interview too, and he really downplayed his daughter's disease, made it sound far less serious than he had before.
"wow...some shocking posts...I guess by this logic, any 2 parent family that both work are doing wrong."
Since that's obviously not what any single person said on this thread, I guess you're using faulty logic.
I heard Santorum on an interview the other day. He said Bella's condition isn't terminal - sometimes she gets an illness that becomes much more serious than for other children. A cold can turn into pneumonia, and it did.
I agree that we all should be there for our children. I gave up a whole decade of earning power and retirement so that my kids could have me there. My husband did miss out a lot on stuff. My husband would have made a great legislator. There was a time I thought he would head down that road, maybe running for our state assembly or senate, then moving up to Congress. He is sharp and intuitive, with great ideas on how to fix things that need fixing, namely most of our very broken government. His path went on a different course, and he opted to do something very different. Yet, I think if he ran, he would have been a winner.
I don't think I would be too thrilled if my husband wanted to run for President, but for politicians, they have a different lens about what they think is appropriate than most of us. That's why they are wiling to spend countless hours on buses, planes, eating crappy hotel food and living out of a suitcase - all in the nature of running for political office. It sounds like a horrific scene to me just getting there. Then once you do, everyone hates you or is trying to unseat you. You have to constantly hit the fundraising circuit so you have the money to get from point A to point B and hope that at the end of the campaign you are victorious. For Presidency, it's not about the money. At least not while you are there. (Hit the speaking tour afterwards and you are golden, though!)
So why would a man with a bajillion kids, one of whom had this birth defect, a chromosomal anomaly, want to run for President? Why leave his pregnant wife behind (who then had a stillbirth)? Because, for him, it meant something bigger than himself or his family to run for this office.
By the way, with regards to Bella's illness, when it comes down to it, all of us are terminal. We just don't know when.
Santorum isn't my guy for lots of reasons, but they don't include him leaving his child with a disability at home to run for higher office.
-- Edited by SamuraiLandshark on Saturday 4th of February 2012 07:42:17 AM
There is a young couple here locally that I do not know personally, but who has connections with my kids and now I have "connected" with them on Face Book. They have a child with severe partial trisomy 13...this little guy was just born a few days ago. He is their first born and they are praying for as many days, hours, minutes as they can get with him. He had the first of potentially many surgeries just today (a heart procedure), which was successful. This young couple's courage and faith in the face of this is just amazing. So I started this thread in light of what they are facing...it just brought the situation with Santorum's daughter and his decision to be away from his family during this time to clear focus for me. Though the exact diagnosis is different, the life-expectancy issues are similar, I believe.
If anyone is interested, here is a link to the young mother's blog about her pregnancy and the birth of their precious baby boy, Dalton. And, please, if you are a person who prays, pray for them.
There is also a Face Book page devoted to him and prayer support for the family. If you are on FB, search for "Prayers for Dalton" and "Like" it to see updates and comments on the wall. There is currently a 24 hour prayer vigil going on for the little guy and his mommy and daddy.
That's very kind of both of you. I truly appreciate it. It's been almost 25 years since we lost him as a baby, but it's a loss a parent never really recovers from.
I was both very surprised and saddened to hear that Rick Santorum has a gravely ill daughter. It doesn't get much worse than that.
His running for the presidential nomination at this time causes me question his judgement. I admit that I could be prejudice, as my husband and I lived through the devastation of losing a child, but even if we hadn't, I don't think I could ever understand his and his wife's decision that this is the right time for him to be on the national campaign trail. As romani pointed out, he has years ahead of him to pursue the office.
Chelsea was a "big girl" of 15 in 1995 when Monica (22) was doing Bill. Of course, she was a little younger than that when Gennifer was providing his favors during their twelve year affair.
Hilary and Chelsea were and are big girls then. Their relationship still lasts, at least outwardly.
Look at Newt, 26% of the R's in Florida, still believe in his leadership abilities. Nearly 100% of the R's believed his rhetoric on BC when he was screwing someone besides his DW.
Back to Rick. Sad situation for his DD. I make no judgements on this situation. He did what he does.
Whatever is this reaction about people having opinions about others lifestyles? What is wrong with that? We make judgements about things all the time....whether right or wrong, we're entitled to our opinions. Now, I'm not going to say anything personally to any of these people that might hurt their feelings, or try to legislate how people must behave, but sure I'll voice an anonymous opinion online, or make a comment about it to my kids or husband.
And soccerguy, yes I am disgusted at Obama. But it's for a very long list of reasons.
"If someone is in a heterosexual marriage with a kid, then realizes that they are really attracted to people of the same sex and get a divorce, do you judge those people too? After all, they aren't putting their family first. They are putting themselves first."
Yep, that's for sure. Had a sister in law who did that. She could have put it off for a few more years, and not had to move away from them and put them through so much pain. But I would never tell her that because I love her dearly and it would hurt her. So I've never said anything critical to her. But she should have waited just a little bit longer until they were out of the house. It was truly ugly and all I can think is that she must have been in complete misery to subject her kids to that.
"Even you admitted that you put your own career ahead of your kids. (For the record, I don't that both parents working is selfish at all. I think it is the smart decision if the parents are capable, but obviously you don't feel that way)."
No, I don't have a problem with two parents working. For us, it basically allowed us to both work part time and for my husband to see his kids more than most dads do. But I dearly wish I'd had the sense to get out of the military before my husband was deployed and I was sent on constant trips. That is what I regret. It wasn't selfish, it was stupid.
I don't think Santorum is using Bella. I just don't think he is there for her, or for her mom, if he is out running for President. In my corner of the world, I would want my kids' dad around as much as possible given the same set of circumstances.