I think Newt is running for a Secretary of Something spot...appease the Tea Party.
Romney was on GMA this a.m. and now the questions are about the negative ads and will this hurt in the long run? I am not a Mitt fan, but I do think he handled the question well. He responded that this is just preparing him for the general election. He stated, which I agree, Obama would have the same negative attacks come next summer, and this actually helps because they can address these issues now.
I agree with you winchester.
I don't how many of you ever saw the 20/20 or maybe it was 60 minutes episode where they take a room full of people pour out 1000 dollars in single bills, they were allowed to keep whatever they got, the only caveat was everyone needed to have some money at the end. This was done to illustrate Congress and spending. Each time they dropped the money everyone just grabbed the money and there was always someone that couldn't get in fast enough to grab. They repeated this over and over again until finally the people around the table realized that when they dumped the money everyone would get the exact same amount.
We are not there as a society and our politicians know that. The voters that are approaching retirement want that saved. The 40-50 yos with children in college want the tax credits. The 30 yos wanting to purchase a home want the mtg deduction saved. The 20 yos want Pell Grants, Stafford Loans, and could care less about any of the things that those who are between 30 and 90 want.
So as a U.S. Senator of any state what do you do to guarantee you don't tick everyone off? You grab for everything and demand everything.
__________________
Raising a teenager is like nailing Jello to a tree
Heard Newt after vote speech. He's upset with superpac. Hey, it was a R issue. Hillary and Bill are prolly about superpacs, philandering, and male egos
This is the problem. Everybody sees the government as a feeding trough, and everybody is trying stick their snout in the trough to get their "fair share."
That's the mentality that needs to change.
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain
Why should they give the money back if it will just be spent on something else?
Sort of like the stimulus money curse: your citizens are co-signing on that loan, whether you drop your own snout in the trough to feed or not. What's really irritating is when you point out to the snuffling crowd that lean times are coming and that the old chestnut about "pigs get fed and hogs get slaughtered" might be a truism for a reason.
I wonder what the percentage of tax money coming back to the state vs what the state paid to the federal government is for red vs blue states.
I think that as long as the blue states continue to vote their principles (mostly the one about the federal government being the wisest entity in the room when it comes to matters of human well-being and uplift) they should just take pride in their good work.
I would suspect that the states getting the money in general are the same states that are represented by Republicans who are against government spending . I suggest that they all give back the money to the federal government to reduce the deficit.
I wonder what the percentage of tax money coming back to the state vs what the state paid to the federal government is for red vs blue states.
Which Red/Blue map are you going to look at? 2004, 2008, 2010, anticipated 2012? It’s awfully hard to draw any sort of conclusions from a map that’s never the same twice.
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain
that's why we have Congressmans and earmarks... Its about getting your fair share and more. Go Ron.
One thing about HighTechnology in California, Is that the Tech workers pay more in Federal Taxes by virtue of their higher pay. Those CA tax dollars are then spent in Utah and Arkansas where the cost of living is low. You get moe buck for the bang.
Florida, the reverse is true. Low wages~low tax receipts~but receiving federal dollars from higher incomed states.
-- Edited by longprime on Monday 30th of January 2012 03:27:47 PM
yes and no
military base closures is always contentious. small bases in the north. big bases in the south.
Louisiana got big bucks from hurricanes and oil spill. Don't hear much from gov Jindel.
Florida hurricanes, housing litigations, visa relaxation/processing. get the idea.
there is a map
R's are tearing themselves apart. One of the political fox commentators said that the 2010 elections only got the R's fatheaded.
I don't understand how the R's can say in Florida that unemployement should be limited, government should get out of home mortgages, immigration is a mess, and too many business regulations.
Florida got a lot of problems, Most of them are self inflicted. Some because of the Government. But the Government and me the taxpayer is spending more $$$$ in Florida than we are taking in.
Me, Get rid of federal flood insurance. Let's see how Floridians would like that.
why are the R candidates pandering the Floridans for their economic wows?
Obama,s administration may not have helped Florida, but any help from somewhere else means it gotta come from somewhere else and who will it cost and how much.
Go Ron.
let the market place correct itself, without Political interference.