This Fischer person has managed to bring us all together... in support and admiration of Sgt. Giunta and in opposition to Fischer. Amazing. Now we can resume our regularly scheduled arguments on other threads.
I respectfully suggest that if Mr. Fischer has any objections to the current method of recognizing heroism in the military, he is more than welcome to pick up a gun, get over to Afghanistan, and demonstrate what he considers is the proper method to us all.
Until then, I also (not so respectfully) suggest he stick to mis-interpreting the New Testament and stay out of passing judgement on the military's method of recognizing courage and sacrifice.
As to Sgt Giunta: I have had the honor of personally meeting a few MOH recepients (note I said recepients; they would NEVER consider themselves "winners" for receiving this honor); this very select club will proudly welcome him to their brotherhood with open arms.
It is miltiary protocol that when two military members are "under cover" (outside, wearing of the service cap), the lower ranking individual renders the salute and the higher ranking individual returns this display of respect. For MOH recepients, there is a special rule: they are ALWAYS saluted first, regardless of rank (even the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, a Four-star General, would salute Sgt. Giunta first).
I would be proud to render salute to Sgt. Giunta, and I know that EVERY military member I know would feel the same. Regardless of what this "Reverend" thinks.
There is a special place in H-E--double-hockey- sticks reserved for Mr. Fischer, one full of mirrors where he is made to pass judgement on himself.
-- Edited by Bullet on Monday 22nd of November 2010 06:31:11 AM
-- Edited by Bullet on Monday 22nd of November 2010 06:32:11 AM
-- Edited by Bullet on Monday 22nd of November 2010 06:32:31 AM
__________________
You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do it? You? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom.
I saw several interviews with Giunta. He is an incredibly impressive young man. Nothing phony about this young man's humility...he's as humble as they come. He was so deserving of the Medal of Honor. Imho, he epitomizes the perfect soldier.
__________________
And who cares if you disagree? You are not me Who made you king of anything? So you dare tell me who to be? Who died and made you king of anything? ~Sara Barielles
here's another link on Giunta, includes a non PC interview: http://restrepothemovie.com/
q: "what went threw your head when you heard you were going to be up for a Medal of Honor?" a: "**** you... in painting the picture of the ambush, it was just my brush stroke... not above and beyond"
on 60 minutes interview: q: "how good a soldier are you?" a: "average... mediocre"
it is strange that there haven't been very many awarded in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I found it impossible to watch the ceremony without crying. And Giunta, the honoree, sprinted over a hill into enemy fire to retrieve a wounded comrade, getting the guy back by killing one of the insurgents who was dragging him away. I don't know if that's masculine or feminine: I would call it incredibly brave and worthy of the high honor bestowed on him.
So... he wants to give people medals only for violating one of the 10 Commandments? I feel like this is a back-asswards Christian. I'm glad he's getting backlash from within the Christian community as well as from the outside.
I want to comment on the rest of his arguments as well (such as God is anger, not love), but it's just not worth it.
Apparently, it is a Christian thing to believe that killing is an honorably masculine trait, whereas saving others at great risk to oneself is a lesser feminine one.
Anyone else willing to bet a lot of money that this Bryan Fischer is a closet homosexual? It seems like gross overkill to try to prove one's "manliness" by taking on the Medal of Honor and proclaiming the masculine virtues of killing.