Political & Elections

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Forward!


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Date: May 4, 2012
RE: Forward!
Permalink  
 


Between this and "Julia" I have to wonder what's going on with the campaign.  Not that I care, mind you, but it is odd.

 

God help us if he is re-elected.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 728
Date: May 4, 2012
Permalink  
 

For me it was immediately a negative association. Forward March was what came into my mind, as if we were all drones following orders.

I think maybe if this was the 2000 election yr it would have worked because we were entering a new century. It may have worked for the 1st term, but 2nd term, it falls flat.

I cannot see how this can help him at all.

Forward, how?

Employment? Green Jobs...well the R's have already hit him with the Solyndra ads and how money is being spent abroad to build, while the companies get bailed out here.

Healthcare? He has to know that like the Clinton's back in the 90's it didn't work out too well.

Social Issues? 2012 is expected to have more foreclosures and homeowners under water, while at the same time still an 8% unemployment rate, can we really afford it as taxpayers?  People vote with their wallet.

Gas prices? Drilling will be an issue.

Tax law changes? Let's see the MOC's up for re-election wanting to discuss this.

Military? Probably he can get a bang for his buck. Yet, he is left vulnerable because the DOD must cut a lot out of their budget, and in the DOD world, it is a huge fear of base closure and members being let go to meet the budget.

College loans? Best bet, but the problem here is that is an empty promise. Anyone with a child in college, or has taken a college loan in their life knows that this a 2 tier uphill battle. 1. Colleges must be regulated, including private. 2. Banks, such as Wells Fargo offer the loans and a new reg would have to be put into place to fix the next "bubble" issue.

I am not in PR, but just an avg voter, and honestly, every big issue using the term FORWARD will be hard for him to translate into votes.



-- Edited by pima on Friday 4th of May 2012 07:00:53 AM

__________________
Raising a teenager is like nailing Jello to a tree


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1124
Date: May 4, 2012
Permalink  
 

What a joke. I can't even believe they're serious . Airheads.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
Date: May 4, 2012
Permalink  
 

http://news.yahoo.com/obamas-forward-slogan-points-america-wrong-direction-205300717.html

Obama's 'Forward!' Slogan Points America in the Wrong Direction

 
 

 

COMMENTARY | President Barack Obama's "Hope and Change" slogan was an effective election tool even though his administration has been a failure. Obama's new slogan is causing quite a bit of head shaking and smirking in the conservative realm.

 

Obama's new "Forward!" slogan is also a term of conviction long used by Marxists to bolster their goal to defeat capitalism, according to the Washington Times. Either Obama's campaign team is too inept to grasp the public relations problems associated with the term or the president is satisfied with the connection to socialism.

President Obama floated several possible slogan ideas during televised speeches over the past several months. Although the phrases that focused on garnering a fair shot or an economy built to last uttered at the microphone were empty rhetoric, at least the words did not have a connection to socialism. Forward is an innocent word when used conversationally, but when embraced as a slogan it leads to further speculation about how far left Obama is willing to bend America.

Perhaps President Obama took a cue from his fan club at MSNBC where the slogan, "Lean Forward" is predominately featured during broadcasts. The Washington Times reports "Forward" has been used as the title of numerous communist publications during the past two centuries. It is doubtful all the political experts on Obama's campaign team simply missed the long-standing reference to socialism.

The socialist slogan will prompt a rehashing into President Obama's past and sketchy associations with radical individuals. If President Obama is not attempting to solidify his ultra-liberal base with the "Forward!" slogan, the lapse in wording judgment will come back to haunt him with months of accusatory headlines.

 

As noted in the Washington Times, self-described communist and former green jobs czar Van Jones is among Obama's more controversial inner-circle of friends. The president's old pal surely knew the double-meaning associated with the word and could have advised him that troubled waters loomed ahead if the term was used during the campaign.

The email command would be a lame slogan even if it did not once again link the current White House occupant to an anti-American way of life. Such a bland slogan is more than a bit out of character for the charismatic orator. If "Forward!" becomes too controversial to retain as a slogan, Obama could shift to using "Onward" or "Upward" and stick with a directional theme.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard