I cannot compete with your wit. But now I think I see how you do it. I thought I had written only two premises. Clearly I was wrong about that, having written three.
You have good eyes.
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain
^winchester: "It doesn't take much thought to know the difference between right and wrong when you have morals. But when morality is relative, practically every decision becomes a science project. "
I'd go along with the first part of not taking much thought; But disagree with the second part in distinquishing between right and wrong. And agree with the third premise of a science project.
I like to keep my responses short, because I got lazy fingers, and even lazier mind.
It doesn't take much thought to know the difference between right and wrong when you have morals. But when morality is relative, practically every decision becomes a science project.
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” – Mark Twain
That's weird--according to this study Obama should be a conservative.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/201203-obama-says-own-worst-trait-is-laziness
Seriously? Now this "study" is low effort thinking. Pick a hypothesis that fits their arrogant liberal thinking (people must be stoopid to be conservative), and get those results that prove it. Yeah, real authorities on this scientific study here. What was it, 90-95% of psychologists are liberal? Surprise, surprise.
Now I guess you could get a very small group of psychologists (because that's all the conservatives there are) to say the opposite, to prove the hypothesis that low effort thinking favors political liberalism....ie, I don't have to take care of myself, the gubmint gonna do it for me.