The Hellfire II, which the predator uses, costs $65,000. The basic Hellfire costs $25,000. Your link confirms they fire Hellfire missiles.
So, the up front cost is $20 million, but that is sunk. That means that each time they fly a mission, the price per mission comes down. Even if they lose one, they don't lose the satellite link or the ground control station.
I absolutely do not claim to be an expert on military hardware, but $1,000,000 per strike sounds very high to me.
To be at $1,000,000/mission, that means each Predator only goes on 5 missions ($20M/4 = $5M per Predator, if you include the other stuff you get for the $20M, each predator will come in even cheaper, which means fewer than 5 missions per Predator)
edit: just to be clear, I saw the numbers in the article, my issue is with them, not with you
-- Edited by soccerguy315 on Tuesday 22nd of February 2011 07:53:04 PM
That's about $204,000 per enemy casualty, with minimal or no risk to US personell.
If we need to kill 4 million "bad guys", that would cost about $820 billion over, say, ten years or about $80 billion a year.
Sounds like a bargain.
The idea that the Post has that only "high value" targets are worthwhile is wrong. When one leader is killed, another will step up. Just kill them all and let Allah sort them out.
We seem to want to deny that we are in a "war of attrition". There is no quick strike or easy kill that will end the thing.
Plus building Predators is good for the economy.
-- Edited by BigG on Monday 21st of February 2011 03:53:07 AM